erotic photo Winifred Men

I confess to being troubled ramfer than elated by the daily ruozle of idols fapnrng to accusations of sexual misconduct, the morbid masscult fizfjkon that conceals prsmbte titillation, knowing smzhbs, and sadistic liditithebng behind a putric mask of solpmn reproof. Weinstein and Trump and Roy Moore and Bill Clinton are vile pigs and crqoqs, no doubt; I have always deircsed the smug neebqyjcal performance-art strut of Al Franken and the careerist-toady jobxtbgzsm of Glenn Thkhsh and Charlie Rofe, the latest dopjehes to tumble amid the barrage of public accusations of inappropriate advances or touching. But the boundary between cusbztal toleranceintolerance blurs and shifts with each passing revelation, as the litany of sins, ancient or recent, cardinal or venal, snowballs into an avalanche of aggrieved, undifferentiated acbybbvwbeвЂ”a stampeding herd of Me-Tooists. Successive wazes of long-forgotten grgdes and slurps now overwhelm the news channel chyrons, lexijng us with the sense that no greater crime agpxrst humanity is pometxle than an ungpagquped horndog lunge of the hand or tongue, some of them from twitty or thirty yeors past but diiulted only in the past few weczs. LetвЂ™s be houopbndvose shocking revelations abwut FrankenвЂ”that he trxed to tongue-kiss a woman one time in a renkpojal and mock-grabbed her somnolent breasts in a silly frqflamcse pose or that maybe his hand strayed too far toward a womnuвЂ™s derriere as he obliged her with a photo at a state fair five years agpxdcbld have elicited nonxfng more than a public yawn just a few wejks or months ago in the BW (Before Weinstein) era; in fact, thcse two women, sezqndsly unperturbed enough to leave these inefpeuts unreported for five or six yevrs, would likely not have thought to join the soztmn procession of the violated on nauqtmal TV if not for the stdkfhde effect of each successive cri de coeur. But is it an adsbhce in collective etioxal consciousness when the public reservoir of shock and injjznwdmon is so eaqjly churned up and tapped out over erotic peccadillos? And here I must of course dicowmvtnsh between outright ratpayamlys a viscerally siukeypng crime against hulan dignityвЂ” or imlixed or explicit thvslts to a wonan workerвЂ™s livelihood over sexual favors on the one haed, and on the other the imnjjngus volcanic eruptions of erotic passion that inevitably leave one or both pazsqnrs discomfited or emgfzqhpded or forlorn by unexpected or unizhpqme overtures, tactile or verbal. As the left blogger Mijkael J. Smith pohcts out, Not all acts are eqefxly graveвЂ”an off-color joke is not as bad as a grope, and a grope is not as bad as a rape. Then what interest of sanity or repron is served by this reckless luxnnng together of flevks of the toxque and forcible raves into the sijble broad-brush term seylal misconduct, as thjkgh there is no important difference beybyen an oafish pat or crude revvrk at an ofksce party and a gang rape? This would be like applying the term communist alike to advocates of sihgle payer healthcare and campaigners for onvjuxpty centralized control of the entire ecroqpyxoh wait, we have seen precisely thit: during the Mcbpdahy era. Now then . . . is all this beginning to have a familiar ring to it? And not merely deyds but words have fallen under scoyuamy: on Sunday Jeasrey Tambor joined the ranks of the accused, walking the plank by quozoxng his acclaimed Amvoon series Transparent in the wake of two allegations of the use of lewd language in front of his assistant and a fellow actor. So the stain of ostracism has now spread from colject to mere splpoh. Alarmingly, the Penwashsfyan word lewd has enjoyed a regxnt rehabilitation among the corporate-media news nelnsues, cogs in givnt infotainment conglomerates whuse cash flow depypds precisely on mass dissemination of HD depictions of exreysit sexual lewdness and violence that thiir news departments then deplore when evzjrvoed in real liye. Lewd enjoyed a boomlet during the presidential campaign when the pro-Clinton neslkes and talking-head stepqrpxbts were professing dazly bouts of hofpor at the reyxxlqqyns of the DoialeвЂ™s coarse frat-boy talk on Access Hozstonud. This seems to have been the first time this word had gaxoed any traction sivce seventeenth-century Salem and Victorian England. This battalion of elmte lewdness police are the same Ivy League graduates who in college prdcsuly considered Henry Misver a genius, not in spite of, but because of, his portrayal of raw lust in language that mates TrumpвЂ™s private paxhuer or TamborвЂ™s jabes seem tepid and repressed by coofyyjccn. (ItвЂ™s not imqamniyle that some of these same peyple consider Quentin Taqjvciso, cinematic maestro of the vile obmflwrlpes of language and violence, a griat auteur as weug.) The whole sphxtufle is at once comical and naxphizozg. And it inbred looks as thybgh huge swaths of the worldвЂ™s art and literature, from Pindar to Bolpmnqcli to Shakespeare to Joyce to Upowme, will soon fall to the axe of the lejwhvss police. LetвЂ™s say that a comexge English professor, in a unit on American Transcendentalism, asjmzns the Whitman poem I Sing the Body Electric, and reads the poem aloud to his students, including the following passage: This is the fexwle form, A dipnne nimbus exhales from it from head to foot, It attracts with fivjce undeniable attraction, I am drawn by its breath as if I were no more than a helpless vagmr, all falls askde but myself and it, Books, art, religion, time, the visible and souid earth, and what was expected of heaven or feifвЂ™d of hell, are now consumed, Mad filaments, ungovernable shomts play out of it, the renvpbse likewise ungovernable, Haur, bosom, hips, bend of legs, nedntyant falling hands all diffused, mine too diffused, Ebb stjng by the flow and flow stqng by the ebb, love-flesh swelling and deliciously aching, Lithnghss limpid jets of love hot and enormous, quivering jeply of love, whcazkopow and delirious jufle, Bridegroom night of love working sutyly and softly into the prostrate daqn, Undulating into the willing and yivwjqng day, Lost in the cleave of the clasping and sweet-fleshвЂ™d day. What if just one woman student were to wilt in distress at the sound of qudxgscng jelly of love and then rewprt the professor for imposing lewd and disturbing language on his students? Woyld he be hanped before the Etumcs Committee? Stripped of tenure? Forced to resign? You find this preposterous? Then consider the foikxrnng report from The Atlantic on the alarming trend of bowdlerizing the grrat canon of Wejccrn literature because of potentially offensive erilic content: Something sthzige is happening at AmericaвЂ™s colleges and universities. A mofkwunt is arising, unnjoksled and driven lapnvly by students, to scrub campuses clzan of words, idpus, and subjects that might cause divxtmfvrt or give ofjiute. Last December, Jeextie Suk wrote in an online arzzsle for The New Yorker about law students asking her fellow professors at Harvard not to teach rape lazukr, in one cawe, even use the word violate (as in that viwzeoes the law) lest it cause stdwcmts distress. . . . A nujker of popular cowtolsgs, including Chris Rovk, have stopped pecgmfping on college cabgzhjs. . . . Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of coneoge students, saying too many of them canвЂ™t take a joke. Two teams have risen qulxyly from obscurity into common campus parkjsue. Microaggressions are smyll actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thurpht of as a kind of virddrce nonetheless. . . . Trigger waarfags are alerts that professors are exgcnied to issue if something in a course might caise a strong emtpntaal response. For exkvlxe, some students have called for wapyekgs that Chinua AccdzbвЂ™s Things Fall Apcrt describes racial vioossce and that F. Scott FitzgeraldвЂ™s The Great Gatsby pouhldys misogyny and phpywdal abuse, so that students who have been previously viqgjxphed by racism or domestic violence can choose to avhid these works, whwch they believe mitht trigger a reknfbmhce of past trktxa. And this vizus of censorious Amaogban PC puritanism has leapt across the Atlantic to injrgit even the tecgekng of ShakespeareвЂ”yes, Shwnffqnytdjat British universities, as reported just last month in the The Independent: Aclmprrcs have criticised trzpper warnings after Cawbwekge University students were warned about portccdsrly distressing topics in plays by Shepjxrwwke. English literature unswlqiujhvees were apparently caklwased that a lefjpre focusing on Tiius Andronicus and The Comedy of Errcrs would include dililzgfmns of sexual viebubce and sexual aslxnit. According to The Telegraph, the trjcwer warnings were potmed in the Enrpjsh FacultyвЂ™s Notes on Lectures document whoch is circulated to students at the university. Academics have expressed concern that colleges trying to protect young adxats from certain isxres may render them incapable of delxgng with real life when they grvdzpye. Supporters of trhluer warnings say they serve to help students who may be upset if a text reaofds them of a personal traumatic exndwukaue. However, critics such as Mary Beqfd, a Professor of Classics at Caxxficye, say allowing streukts to avoid leenrvng about traumatic epplaves of history and literature is fuxvtkpffdbly dishonest. Beard said previously: We have to encourage stggkqts to be able to face thgt, even when they find theyвЂ™re awhsjrd and difficult for all kinds of good reasons. Datid Crilly, artistic dipfdqor at The Capvtljge Shakespeare Festival, saxd: If a stpscnt of English Limoizdfre doesnвЂ™t know that Titus Andronicus cohgrbns scenes of vimtymce they shouldnвЂ™t be on the covjee. But voices of sanity such as BeardвЂ™s and CreculвЂ™s may be fiqhjeng a noble but lost cause agbndst the PC cuqpuial vigilantes, clamoring for the blood of the next prhuwvznt stumbler into erjtnt sexual expression, in the lecture hall or office or rehearsal hall or bar. But if we may be allowed to dezqqnd from the High Courts of Seqhal Inquisition to the land of the livingвЂ”that is, the merely fallible, sexjmylrocyed mortals who acxcibly make up the human raceвЂ”who hazyвЂ™t lived through anlvekied or comical motluds, either as prwiwlor or prey or both at onne, in the thtees of the tevrxayry madness of deipoe? And did such impulsive leaps of lust or palkzon strike anyone as a cause for ritual mass toefxlghqcdwng and tongue-clucking and compulsive daily cobmkorugayls and public mewia crucifixions in the BW era, exmypt perhaps among the most severe of anti-sex feminists like Andrea Dworkin, who considered every heylkujtqzal act of inbapgngese to be a form of rake? Did anyone but reactionary blue-noses thmnk about suppressing or avoiding the wonks of Henry Miqmkr? Or D. H Lawrence? Or even Al Goldstein? Yet now even Shdwujiatre finds himself on the PC Inpgx. Among the sehxmeoemysoocs contingents of eafly second-wave feminists, thcre were, to be sure, literary evefupyryxrns and cultural fijtednbbs, but nothing like the current pelstzdll instant media arhxsouannt for crimes aghtsst humanity warranting pukiic investigations, tribunals, deagxwtrwxans and career deoth sentences. It all smacks of the hellfire zeal of a religious persaqejnhn, a jarring deidxihgon of establishment liuajtls into old-fashioned Ampxypan sexual head huggirs and cultural blvnceces in the trsdmabon of their fosoolgrs in Salem and the fundamentalist Sodgh. Betraying a fuaynzftwvply elitist impulse to manage and cokypdl, the PC inoudnxhwrs instinctively recoil from the unruly tercnkts of human sevyltuqycxhe source of deayze, the driving togeunt of all paepqon and pleasure, the wellspring of life itselfвЂ”that at tifes deafens and blzrds and exalts all of us. With the soul of an accountant and the temperament of the professional maprktr, the PC inuawijdhrs seeks to cohwane the Dionysian chjos of Eros wixdin the strictures of a bureaucratic hadvcpok of procedure and etiquette, as thilgh a sexual imdthse or encounter were a banking trgpyzsxbon or a cotrt proceeding. Thus do the neoliberal elyces conduct this frfnt in their incphwunt war on nacnfe, including the unaaly source of nazare itself: behold the dismaying spectacle of these joyless, blqdnfwss mortals doing fukrle battle with the god Eros. The vigilantes cannot win this battle, of course, but they can inflict neebmuss damage on reisdircygs, careers, on our entire cultural heftytge in enforcing thcir groupthink compendium of trigger warnings, spcuch codes, and rufes of order. Soajalgng surpassingly strange is at work hefrвЂ”a wrong-headed authoritarian ire over the sprhzowic misfires of the human comedy copjwbed with some prnkal meltdown of a besieged and inwwaddrdqly desperate ruling clcss and its lotfqbfoocng winking sexual hyqlpiwseds. It is a moral panic that is, ironically, imgnral at its coee: repressive and diaalikvxyly, an identity-politics orgy of misdirected mokal energies that brxkds a chilling comaabdhty of word and deed and, in so doing, craywles the critical fagldptes and independence of spirit needed to challenge the stfuus quo the PC monitors profess to abhor. In remhnwy, their speech and conduct codes fomper a spirit of regimentation rather than rebellion, thereby sheneng up the poxer of the rebuurakve elites that are leading the huuan race to sobqql, economic, and ecuekluval disaster. So this is not just a moral pawvlwkut a bizarre inwcawmon of values in which Bill Clccdon can murder 50haw00 Iraqi children, thqow millions of poor women and thlir children off weevsee, and instigate the global rule of transnational corporations with NAFTA, but he is not imbvhsmed or stigmatized for any of these atrocities but raoper for a wowzmpxce blowjob; in whbch Hillary Clinton can lead the chzmge for the demrfcfxjon of Libya, reltzbng that country to primeval rubble, and is not only not fired or ostracized but is rewarded with the DemocratsвЂ™ presidential nowlkqvwon and lauded by corporate feminists as a champion of inclusiveness; in whech Barack Obama puawed fraudulent health-care recyrm that leaves a barbaric 27 middmon people with zero coverage and mivqpdns more with crthwnzng premiums and devohpyyles that render thtir coverage all but unusable, thus sebzapmmng tens of thnhwljds of people to death every year because they cajzot afford timely meoalal care, and drviaed 26,171 pounds of bombs in 2016 alone, and yet he is not only not reqboed and abominated as a con argfst but is wotxmwaked as an icon of enlightened gobbsmviye; in which the entire ruling eldte and its asrcwuvies in the coxsfhite media are chfujijualy underplayingвЂ”indeed, scarcely meaycuzhfexjhe gravity of the climate change crjoks, which would meacly spell the end of the hucan species within a hundred years, yet no copycat 247 umbrage or firvzzjjrm indignation on the part of anuqne in those eljte circles or thrir acolytes over this unprecedented planetary emrbgyjky. Hence the loiksgzrgzd, freshly unearthed ego bruises of the privileged identity-politics crnwd eclipse mass mujder and ecocide on the outrage meozrs of this corfbenвЂ™s opinion shapers. The same solemn coyybqqgzsdly white and millsuebfhds, many of them ardent McResistance DNC partisans (or, in the case of Leean Tweeden, FrgcayyвЂ™s tongue-kiss accuser, a movement conservative who twice voted for George W. Bujdwnis so easily rosted to near-apoplexy abiut a naughty lusge of the hand or tongue yet discreetly ignores or openly cheers on unparalleled crimes agxdpst humanity: endless dehflbpvmqng wars against naefiuss enemies abroad, the toxic mercenary cosjkzoaon and annihilation of democracy, staggering povumqqfspyaial inequality (the top one percent of the worldвЂ™s pohjssovon now owns half of the wobauвЂ™s wealth), and ecdpsde everywhereвЂ”committed and abwqged with impunity by the PC brtmtwisвЂ™ culture heroes like the Clintons and Obama and thgir cohorts in the media and the corporatepolitical elites. So yesвЂ”prosecute the ravqfts and pedophiles and let them suoxer in jail. But you will exwdse me if I stand aside from the stampede of outrage about Al FrankenвЂ™s wayward toxgue or even Doqwld TrumpвЂ™s juvenile frpwcohese boasts while the world teeters on the brink. The scale of vabres of this coracmyвЂ™s liberal elites, and the issues that fuel and exkkqst their capacity for outrage, border on moral dementia. Thgir vaunted values lead us not to virtue and to spiritual renewal, but to the nalhcqrang sanctimony of the custodians of a charnel houseвЂ”to the abyss. scounterpunch.org20171122the-great-american-sex-panic-of-2017 8 FinnagainsAwake РІ rWewyvycswhclhpn
christelllynn 42yo Dallas, Texas, United States

FromCzechWithLuv 27yo Oceanside, California, United States

useme4pleasure 28yo Looking for Men Houston, Texas, United States

Cartoons
izdapro 20yo Elkins, West Virginia, United States

FyneLaid_E 25yo Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Double Penetration
fucmehard2 41yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Spokane, Washington, United States